Attributions of deception in dating situations

Rated 4.12/5 based on 576 customer reviews

Laboratory lying does not, in itself, benefit the liar, nor does it do obvious harm to the target of the lie.

This chapter considers deception in a broader context.

At least this is the basic premise that underlies the attempts to discover cues to deception.

Lying in the real world covers more than lying studied in the laboratory: lying is often done for personal or ideological gain; it can harm the victim, and it is often carried out over a considerable span of time. In fact, deception can be carried out without explicit lying.

The fundamental attribution error occurs when we overestimate how much another person's behavior can be explained by dispositional factors.

Morality is a concern because of its impact on leakage.

In most situations, a person has to rely on verbal and nonverbal cues to judge if someone is lying or trying to deceive in other ways.

It reflects failing to adequately consider the role of some situational factors that may affect a person's behavior. You observe that there is a student in the class that has been very quiet during the entire term.

The student does not even talk during the class discussions.

Leave a Reply